Welcome to the amara Help Center
Use this guide to explore asset, risk, assessment, supplier, training and document workflows. Ask amara can help with supported questions about authorised information.
The platform combines governed records, workflow modules, role-aware access and deployment-specific controls.
Choose your starting point
Start with the work your role permits: register an Asset, review a risk, open an assessment or continue an assigned training course. For software exposure, open Vulnerability Assurance when it is enabled.
Keep the scope clear
The modules and integrations available to you depend on your role and deployment. Before using an external connector or AI provider, check its data boundary and your organisation's rules.
Review the scope, evidence, responsibilities and operating boundary before relying on a proposal or configured service.
How Modules Connect
Shared records provide context across asset, risk, supplier and assessment work. A link between records does not mean that every score or approval changes automatically.
Solid connections show explicit workflow hand-offs; dashed connections provide supporting context and still require human review.
Follow the evidence
Use the links in a record to review related information. Configured Jira and Confluence actions connect permitted work with those external services; confirm external writes before proceeding.
Vulnerability work
Vulnerability Assurance uses software lists and individual CVE findings. Guided Tasks group related work for review while preserving each finding's decisions. A resolved ticket or a scanner non-detection does not by itself close the finding.
Shared records can support several reviews, while each framework keeps its own scope, requirements and decision.
Platform at a Glance
amara provides asset and risk management, security assessments, NIS2 workflows, supplier management, training, document tools, Ask amara, administration and security scanning. Vulnerability Assurance is available when enabled.
Compare written offers using the same scope, responsibilities and lifecycle assumptions; this guide promises no fixed savings.
Explore the actual scope
Use the sidebar and module dashboards to see the work available to your role. Reports and exports belong to the relevant module; options vary by workflow.
Discuss deployment and terms
Ask AMARA about the intended deployment, enabled integrations, operational requirements and current commercial terms. This guide does not quote prices or promise an implementation timetable.
Available components, responsibilities, support and commercial terms are agreed for the selected deployment.
Data Flow Explained
Asset, risk and supplier records can provide context for related workflows. Review the linked record and its current status before making a decision.
Linked records provide context; assessment, approval and treatment decisions remain explicit within their own workflows.
Assessment evidence
An assessment records responses and evidence for its own scope. Relevant evidence may support another assessment, but each framework's requirements and gaps need a separate review.
External evidence
Enabled connectors can return Jira, Confluence, scanner or cloud evidence. Check the source, timestamp and permissions; a status update is not a substitute for the required approval.
Technical Architecture
For technical teams who need the deployment boundary. amara is a web application with governed records, document retrieval and configurable intelligence processing. External traffic occurs only through deliberately configured connectors or governed public-intelligence retrieval. Confirm exact components, controls and resource sizing for the selected environment with your implementation team.
Architecture boundary: optional Jira, Confluence, Azure, AWS and scanner connectors plus governed VA public-intelligence retrieval; the local application remains the record and approval point.
Stack Overview
| Layer | Customer-facing description | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Web application | Deployment-managed application services | 17 governed product modules and role-aware access |
| Records | Deployment-managed data store | Governed records and audit evidence |
| Document retrieval | Configured document services | Supported policy and procedure retrieval |
| Intelligence processing | Configured by deployment | Grounded analysis and drafting where enabled |
| Network boundary | Deployment-managed gateway and access controls | Protects approved inbound and outbound paths |
| Operations | Implementation-specific runtime | Maintenance, backup and recovery procedures |
Layered Security Controls
Layered controls: network boundary, encrypted transport, strong authentication, access control, audit evidence and governed records.
Three-Factor Authentication
Strong authentication can combine an approved certificate, password and time-based verification, subject to the selected deployment policy.
AI Architecture
Pipeline: Compliance Gate → Smart Router → Privacy Shield → governed processing → Audit Log
Resource requirements
Resource sizing depends on the number of users, retained records, document corpus, enabled modules, integrations, scan workload, availability requirements and processing configuration. Agree sizing, monitoring, backup, recovery and update procedures with the implementation team before production use.
Deployment Options
amara can be deployed in a managed, customer-operated or appliance-style environment. The available integrations, operational controls, data boundary and commercial terms depend on the selected deployment and agreement.
Managed, customer-operated and appliance-style deployment options — availability and terms are agreed for the selected environment
Deployment Profiles
| Profile | Operating model | Best for | Planning point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Managed | Provider-operated environment | Teams that need a managed service | Agree support, data and integration boundaries |
| Customer-operated | Your approved infrastructure | Teams with their own operating model | Size, harden and maintain the environment |
| Appliance-style | Pre-configured environment | Controlled or restricted environments | Agree update and support procedures |
| Air-gapped | Isolated operating design | Environments with no enabled network connectors | Plan offline maintenance and evidence exchange |
Deployment Architecture
Deployment boundary: web application → governed records and document services → configured intelligence processing
Implementation components are deployment-specific. The customer-facing architecture is a web application, governed records, approved document services, configurable intelligence processing and explicitly enabled connectors. Do not treat a Help diagram as a production build specification.
Network requirements
Network requirements depend on the selected deployment and enabled services. An isolated environment must not enable networked connectors, public-intelligence refresh or remote scanner access without an approved boundary.
TLS / HTTPS Configuration
Use encrypted transport and an approved certificate policy. Confirm the available certificate and strong-authentication options with your implementation team.
Backup Strategy
Agree the backup frequency, retention, encryption, recovery objective and restoration test process for the selected deployment before production use.
Set up the approved environment, organisation settings, access roles and operational procedures with your implementation team before onboarding users.
Quick Start
Sign in with an authorised account and review the modules visible in your sidebar. Ask an administrator about missing access rather than assuming a feature is unavailable.
An illustrative onboarding sequence; prerequisites, duration, deliverables and acceptance are agreed separately.
Create a useful starting record
In Asset Management, register an asset you are responsible for and complete the required fields. In Risk Management, record a relevant risk and link the available asset context. Use the applicable assessment module to review your security posture.
Continue with a clear next action
Review the saved record and its evidence. Assign the responsible owner or proceed to the next available workflow step. Ask amara can help retrieve supported information, subject to your role.
Your First Login
After signing in, use the sidebar to open a module available to your role. The application supports English and German; use its language control to choose.
Navigate the application
Module dashboards, lists and record links lead to related work. Use normal navigation controls to open records and return to the relevant list.
Access depends on your role
An administrator assigns the permissions needed for your work. Optional integrations and Vulnerability Assurance also depend on deployment configuration.
Organisation Setup
Administrators maintain organisation information used by relevant workflows and document fields. Enter accurate information and review changes when your organisation changes.
Prepare reliable inputs
Use the actual legal name, contacts and other fields required by the selected form. NIS2 relevance results depend on the information and scope supplied.
Review the result
Check generated documents and assessment outputs after changing organisation details. A saved setting does not prove that every existing record has been updated.
Users and Roles
Administrators create and maintain user accounts and assign the permissions needed for each person's work.
Assign limited access
Use the role controls in the current Admin Panel. NIS2 Compliance and Vulnerability Assurance IT Owner each have dedicated controls. General Assessments can grant access across CIA, Rapid Assessment, ISO 27001, BSI C5 and EU AI Act; dedicated controls for those assessment areas remain available. Security Scanning has its own permission.
Read-only access
The read-only flag restricts changes; it does not grant access to every module. Combine it with the relevant viewing permissions and verify the resulting interface.
Plan Your Onboarding
Use this sequence to organise onboarding. Timing depends on your organisation, data, responsibilities and the intended deployment.
Prepare the environment, configure the organisation, populate records and review the intended launch scope.
Establish the foundation
Agree the operating environment, access roles and organisation information. Register a useful initial set of assets and suppliers, then review their completeness.
Build evidence and review readiness
Run the relevant assessments, record risks and treatment responsibilities, prepare policy drafts and assign training. Review the actual results before deciding whether the environment is ready for broader use.
The sequence is a planning aid, not a fixed timetable or certification promise.
Asset Management
Register and maintain the hardware, software, data, services and facilities relevant to your organisation. The asset record provides ownership and classification context for related work.
Register a real asset, record its context, connect relevant work and review it throughout its lifecycle.
Start with a real asset
Open Asset Management and use the available creation control. Complete the required identification, category and ownership fields, then review the saved record.
Link relevant work
Use the supported links to suppliers, risks and assessments. For security scanning or Vulnerability Assurance, confirm the asset's eligibility and the permissions required by that workflow.
Registering an Asset
Open Asset Management and create a record for something your organisation actually owns or operates. Use a descriptive name and complete the required fields shown in the form.
Asset records move from discovery through classification, protection and periodic review.
Record responsibility and context
Record the owner, category and other information you can verify. Review the classification choices in the application rather than treating example scores as mandatory values.
Verify after saving
Open the saved record and confirm its details. Add the relevant supplier or risk links through the supported controls; review any validation message before proceeding.
CIA Assessment
CIA means confidentiality, integrity and availability. Use the CIA assessment workflow to evaluate an asset's protection requirements and relevant measures.
The assessment records inputs, owner review, security context and the final responsible approval.
Use the current assessment
Select the asset and service context, then work through the measures and recommendations presented by the application. Classification labels and assessment scales serve different purposes; use the labels shown in the form.
Review and approve
Follow the assessment's review and approval workflow. Record the reasons and evidence for your decisions. CIA assessment is separate from the internal priority used in Vulnerability Assurance.
Maintaining Assets
Keep asset records current as systems, responsibilities and supplier relationships change.
Review ownership, classification, dependencies and evidence as the asset changes.
Review the record
Check ownership, classification, location and linked work according to your organisation's review schedule. Record changes through the available asset controls.
Retire with care
Before retiring an asset, review the linked risks, suppliers, scans and vulnerability evidence. Preserve the records required by your organisation's evidence and retention rules.
Asset Data Import and Export
Use the import or export controls provided by the relevant module and deployment. Confirm the accepted format before preparing a file.
Review imported data
Check required fields, categories and record ownership. Review the resulting records after import; a successful import is not proof that every entry is accurate.
Choose the available export
Use an export offered by the current interface and check the file's scope and contents. This guide does not promise every format for every record type.
Asset Module Connections
Asset records can be linked to risks, approved supplier relationships and assessments through the relevant module controls.
Asset and CIA context can support assessments and risks without replacing their separate review and approval.
Review each link
Check the linked record and the decision it represents. Asset classification provides context; it does not automatically establish compliance or close a risk.
Software and scanners
An eligible asset can supply context for authorised scans and software-based vulnerability work. A registered asset alone is not proof that software is installed or that the asset is vulnerable.
Vulnerability Assurance
Vulnerability Assurance helps you record operated software, review public vulnerability evidence and govern individual findings. Availability depends on the enabled deployment and your permissions.
Record software, match evidence, prioritise and act, then verify each finding before closure.
Start from the Overview
Create or open a software list. Review the recommended next task and the Guided Tasks view. Related work is grouped for navigation, while decisions and governance actions remain individual per CVE.
Review before closure
Confirmed findings can link to Risk, Treatment, time-limited Risk Acceptance and Jira. Verification requires the appropriate evidence and reviewer decision; a closed ticket or a scan with no finding is not an automatic all-clear.
Software Lists and Intake
Start with a software list for products you can identify. Manual entry and general CSV intake support a list without requiring an Asset for every entry.
Optional Asset evidence
For an eligible Asset, review software candidates supplied by a supported SBOM or compatible stored or fresh scan. Confirm product identity and version before treating a candidate as an operated installation.
Preserve uncertainty
Unsupported version formats or uncertain product identity require clarification. Missing public evidence or a scanner non-detection must not be interpreted as proof that the software is safe.
Guided Tasks and CVE Findings
Guided Tasks group related vulnerability work so you can find the next useful action. The technical CVE register and finding history provide additional detail.
Decisions remain individual
Review the software identity, version, source evidence and affected scope for each CVE. A grouped task is not a bulk approval or closure mechanism.
Priority and public severity
The amara Environmental Score is an internal prioritisation aid. It must not be presented as an official CVSS score. Review the explanation and evidence for the current finding.
Remediate, Verify and Close
Choose the appropriate response for a confirmed finding: delivery work, a Risk and Treatment, or a time-limited acceptance where the workflow permits it.
Record the change and evidence
Use your organisation's change process. Record what changed, the affected scope and the evidence supporting the result. A suitable authorised scan can contribute verification evidence.
Make the reviewer decision
Review the individual CVE finding and its evidence before closure. Preserve an open or clarification state when proof is insufficient. Scanner non-detection cannot erase a recorded vulnerable software assignment.
Risk Management
Use Risk Management to identify, assess and track risks and their treatment or acceptance decisions.
Record the risk, assess likelihood and impact, make the responsible decision and track treatment evidence.
Create a reasoned assessment
Describe the risk, link the relevant asset context and record likelihood, impact and evidence using the current workflow.
Track responsibility
Assign and review treatment work through the supported controls. Reports and monitoring views reflect the available records; a completed task still needs the required validation.
Creating a Risk
With the required permission, create a risk record describing the event, its potential impact and the relevant asset context.
Assess and assign
Use the likelihood and impact choices in the current form. Record your reasoning, select a treatment strategy and assign responsibility through the supported workflow.
Review the decision
Follow the approval or acceptance process for the risk. An example score, deadline or job title in a guide does not replace your organisation's decision rules.
Risk Scoring
Risk scores combine likelihood and impact using the application's assessment scale. Review the score and its explanation in the risk record.
Illustrative 4×4 scoring matrix; confirm the scale and decision rules used by the selected workflow.
Severity bands for the illustrative 4×4 scale.
Use evidence and context
Base likelihood and impact on the actual situation. Linked asset information can inform the assessment; it does not remove the assessor's responsibility to justify the result.
Review residual risk
After treatment, review the remaining risk and the evidence for any changed score. Follow the required approval or acceptance workflow.
Risk Treatment Plans
Record how your organisation will respond to a risk: mitigate, transfer, avoid or accept, as appropriate to the available workflow.
Make the plan actionable
Specify responsibility, planned work and the relevant timing and evidence. Update progress through the treatment controls and review any linked Jira status.
Verify completion
A resolved Jira ticket may support a review and progress update. The responsible person still needs to perform the required validation before the linked treatment and risk are considered complete.
Risk Module Connections
Risk records can retain asset context and links to relevant evidence. Assessment findings can inform the creation or review of risks.
Linked evidence supports the risk review; it does not automatically approve, score or close the risk.
Use linked work carefully
Where enabled, Jira and Confluence provide external task or document links. Review the actual linked record and its scope.
Keep decisions explicit
A changed external status does not by itself approve an assessment or prove that a vulnerability has been removed. Follow the relevant risk, treatment and verification controls.
Security and Compliance Assessments
Use the assessment that matches the question you need to answer. The Assessments area contains CIA, Rapid Assessment, ISO 27001, BSI C5 and EU AI Act; NIS2 has a separate workflow.
Each framework requires its own applicability and scope review; shared records do not establish legal compliance.
Reuse relevant evidence while keeping the requirements and conclusions of each review separate.
Record a defined scope
Complete the relevant questions or controls with accurate responses and supporting evidence. Review gaps and remediation options in that module.
Interpret results carefully
An assessment result describes the recorded scope and evidence. It is not a certification or a legal determination, and does not automatically satisfy another framework.
Choose an Assessment
CIA evaluates an asset's protection needs. Rapid Assessment provides an initial security-posture review. ISO 27001, BSI C5 and EU AI Act address their respective assessment scopes.
Define the scope, record responses and evidence, review gaps and inspect the available outputs.
NIS2
Open NIS2 Compliance for its relevance assessment, gap review and remediation workflow.
Work through the selected module
Follow the current form and review the saved responses, gaps and available reports. Question counts, report options and approval steps differ between assessments.
Rapid Assessment
Use Rapid Assessment to establish an initial view of security posture. Select the relevant domains and answer the questions shown by the application.
Record the active scope and evidence before interpreting the assessment result.
Review your responses
Provide accurate answers and retain supporting information. The resulting score and gap analysis reflect the selected scope and recorded responses.
Choose the next action
Review recommendations and decide which issues need further assessment or risk treatment. Completion time depends on the scope and evidence available.
Scoring and outputs depend on the selected assessment and its recorded responses.
Illustrative maturity language; inspect the actual assessment scale and evidence.
ISO 27001 Assessment
Use the ISO 27001 assessment workflow to record control responses, evidence and applicability for your intended ISMS scope.
Work through the controls
Enter organisation information, select the scope and record each relevant response. Review gaps and remediation work rather than treating an unanswered control as a verified conclusion.
Prepare the Statement of Applicability
Generate and review the SoA from the recorded assessment. Confirm applicability, exclusion reasons and evidence with the responsible ISMS owner. The assessment itself does not award certification.
EU AI Act Assessment
Use this assessment to evaluate your organisation's AI systems against Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. It turns AI governance, risk, transparency and human-oversight obligations into a scoped evidence and remediation workflow.
Start with the AI context
Create an assessment and state your organisation's role (provider, deployer, importer, distributor or a combination), the relevant AI-system types, deployment region and use sectors. This context keeps the assessment focused on obligations that apply to the systems you actually operate.
Work through the applicable domains
| Area | What you record |
|---|---|
| Governance and accountability | Ownership, policies and responsible oversight for the AI system. |
| Risk management and data governance | Risk controls, data quality and evidence of operation. |
| Transparency and human oversight | User information, monitoring and human intervention arrangements. |
| Technical documentation and compliance | Technical evidence, gaps, remediation and report-ready records. |
Create and scope the assessment
Enter the organisation and AI-system context, then select the applicable domains.
Assess questions and evidence
For each applicable question, record implementation status, maturity, evidence, gaps and notes. Questions that do not fit the chosen role or risk level stay out of the active scope.
Review gaps and remediation
Use the gap view and implementation tracking to turn incomplete controls into owned work. A Jira ticket can be created from an eligible gap where that connector is enabled.
Generate evidence-led reports
Use the executive, technical, gap or comprehensive report to explain the current assessment state without treating missing maturity data as a zero score.
EU AI Act assessment evaluates AI-system obligations. Vulnerability Assurance is the separate workflow for recorded software and public vulnerability evidence. Both can contribute to a wider risk picture without overwriting one another's decisions.
NIS2 Compliance
The NIS2 module supports a relevance assessment, gap analysis and remediation planning.
Assess relevance, record the scoped responses and plan owned follow-up actions; the result remains subject to review.
Start with accurate information
Complete the organisation and sector inputs required by the relevance workflow. Review the classification and its reasoning against the requirements applicable to your organisation.
Assess and remediate
Record the current implementation and evidence in the assessment. Review identified gaps and the available remediation actions. The score reflects the recorded assessment; it is not a legal determination of compliance.
BSI C5 Assessment
Use the C5 assessment to review cloud-security criteria for the selected service scope.
The module supports a scoped cloud-service assessment; it is not an independent C5 attestation.
Record responses and evidence
Select the relevant domains and complete the current assessment. Review each criterion and supporting evidence; do not assume an ISO assessment has completed the C5 work for you.
Review the result
Use the available gap and report views to plan further work. An application-generated report is not an independent C5 attestation.
Statement of Applicability
The SoA records the applicability of controls for the selected ISO 27001 assessment.
Prepare the underlying assessment
Complete the relevant responses and document the reasons for exclusions. Check that the evidence reflects the organisation's actual implementation.
Generate and review
Use the available SoA control, then review the resulting document for completeness and accuracy with the responsible owner. Maintain it when the scope or implementation changes.
Supplier Management
Maintain supplier information, assess the relationship and record the approval decision.
Record the relationship, assess its evidence and dependencies, and document the responsible approval.
Start with a verified profile
Record the actual services, access and relevant evidence. Follow the fields and review steps in the current supplier workflow.
Use approved links
Review the supplier's status before linking it to an asset. Maintain the relationship and its evidence as circumstances change; a recorded approval is not a compliance guarantee.
Adding a Supplier
Open Supplier Management and use its creation control. Enter accurate information about the supplier and the services involved.
Complete the required fields
Record the relevant contacts, data handling, access and supporting security information requested by the form. Follow any validation messages.
Review and approve
Use the supplier review workflow to assess the relationship and record the responsible decision. Confirm the saved profile and status before creating related asset links.
Supplier Criticality
Use the supplier assessment to record the relationship, access, data and dependency information relevant to your organisation.
Assess the actual relationship
Evaluate the factors shown in the current form using evidence about the supplier. Do not infer a universal review timetable from an example score.
Review the decision
The supplier approval process records the responsible decision. Reassess when the relationship, services or evidence change.
Supplier Lifecycle
Keep the supplier profile, evidence and approval status current throughout the relationship.
Review changes
Check service scope, access, contacts and relevant security information according to your organisation's review process. Use the current controls to record the review.
End the relationship responsibly
Review linked assets and outstanding work before decommissioning. Confirm that access and data-handling obligations have been addressed outside the application as required.
Supplier Approval
Use the supplier workflow to record the information, assessment and approval needed for the relationship.
Approval follows recorded supplier information, security review and a reasoned owner decision.
Review before approving
Check the supplier profile and evidence. The responsible approver should record a reasoned decision rather than treating the existence of a supplier record as approval.
Link approved relationships
Use the available asset-link controls and follow the validation shown by the application. An approved record supports evidence; it does not itself establish regulatory compliance.
Supplier Module Connections
Supplier records can link to the assets they support and retain the approval history for the relationship.
Use the evidence
Review relevant supplier information when assessing risk or compliance. Confirm the scope and currency of each supporting document.
Supported queries
Ask amara can retrieve supported supplier information when your role permits it. Review the source rather than assuming every natural-language query is available.
Document Dialog
Document Dialog helps you prepare ISMS documents from templates and organisation information.
Templates produce drafts for organisation-specific review, versioning and responsible approval.
Create and review a draft
Select a template, complete its form and generate a document. Review the content and adapt it to your organisation before using it as policy.
Maintain the record
Use the editor, version history and available export controls. Configured Jira or Confluence actions are separate external actions and require the applicable permissions.
Document Templates
Browse the current Document Dialog catalogue to find a template that fits your purpose.
Choose by scope
Review the template description and fields. Select what you need for the actual process or policy; a template title is not proof that every requirement is covered.
Adapt and review
Complete the form with accurate information and review the generated draft. The available catalogue is the application view, not a fixed count promised by this guide.
Generating a Document
Open Document Dialog and select a suitable template. Complete the fields shown in the form using accurate organisation information.
Select a suitable template, create the draft, review the content and record the final decision.
Review the generated draft
Check populated fields, missing information and the meaning of each section. Edit the document to reflect your actual processes.
Keep the right evidence
Review the saved version and use the available history or export controls. Publication to a configured external service is a separate action.
Document Version History
Document Dialog provides version history and comparison views for saved documents.
Compare changes
Open the document's version controls and select the versions you want to compare. Review the actual content changes and the available author and timestamp information.
Retention
Confirm your deployment's retention and backup policy with the responsible operator. Version history is not a guarantee against every form of data loss.
Information Security Policy
The ISP area provides a structured policy reference with sections, subsections and search.
Find relevant content
Browse the table of contents or use the policy search to locate a topic. Read the relevant section in context before relying on it.
Related work
Where enabled, create a reviewed Jira task or link an existing Confluence page from a policy section. Use Document Dialog when preparing a separate organisation-specific document.
Reviewing Documents
Keep policy documents aligned with the organisation's current processes and responsibilities.
Plan the review
Agree a review owner and schedule through your organisation's document-control process. Check the current document and its available history.
Record the outcome
Update and save the relevant changes, then follow your organisation's approval process. Confirm any notification or automation capability in the actual deployment.
Document Dialog Workflow
Choose a template, complete the form and generate a draft. Use the editor to refine it and the version views to inspect changes.
Export the document
Use the export controls available for the document or selected version. Review the exported content before distributing it.
Optional Confluence publication
When the integration and permissions allow it, review the target and content before publishing. Check the resulting Confluence link and page; an external update is a separate action from saving locally.
Training
Training provides role-based security learning through knowledge cards, quizzes and completion records.
Training content is assigned by role and produces completion evidence for review.
Complete the assigned curriculum and required quizzes before the certificate is issued.
Learn and complete the course
Open an assigned course, read and complete its cards, then take the quizzes. The normal passing threshold is 80%; follow the criteria shown for the quiz.
Certificate and review
A certificate is issued after all required cards and quizzes are completed. Training records support evidence of learning; they do not automatically determine compliance with a regulation.
Training Courses
The training catalogue groups roles into specialist, executive and functional learning areas. Open the current catalogue or your assigned courses to see what is available.
Match the role to the responsibility
A learner may have more than one training role. Administrators assign the roles appropriate to the person's actual work.
Complete the curriculum
Work through the knowledge cards and quizzes shown for the course. Review the completion requirements and resulting certificate; course completion is evidence of training, not a legal compliance verdict.
Knowledge Cards and Quizzes
Each training role has a curriculum of knowledge cards and quizzes. Work through the cards and use the course controls to record completion.
Take the quizzes
Read each question and select the appropriate answer or answers. The normal pass threshold is 80%; check the criteria and feedback shown in the current quiz.
Complete the curriculum
Certificate issuance requires the required cards to be completed and every quiz to be passed. Review any remaining work on the course overview.
Training Certificates
After the required cards and quizzes are completed, Training issues a course certificate with a verification hash and validity dates.
Review and retain
Open the certificate to check the name, course and completion information. The certificate has a print-friendly view; use the browser's print controls when you need a PDF.
Understand the evidence
A verification hash is not an unforgeability guarantee or an independent certification. The record supports training evidence. Review the renewal action carefully because it restarts the course's progress.
Training Administration
Training administrators assign roles and review per-user and per-role progress.
Review completion
Use the training dashboard to identify completed and outstanding work and inspect the relevant course or certificate record.
Export evidence
Use the available CSV or HTML reports and review their scope before sharing. Training completion does not automatically update every external compliance assessment.
Ask amara -- Your GRC Co-pilot
Instead of navigating dashboards and exporting reports, ask a question such as "What are my top risks?" or "Which suppliers access critical systems?" Ask amara routes supported requests to governed data, documentation and configured integrations. Always review important output before acting on it.
How to use Ask amara
Click Ask amara under Resources in the left sidebar. You'll see a clean chat interface with the greeting "Hello! I'm amara -- How can I help you today?" At the bottom, there's an input box labelled "Message amara..." with a send button. Type your question in natural language (English or German) and press Enter or click the arrow.
Review important answers against their cited sources before making decisions. Generated analysis can contain errors.
Try these queries right now
Here are real queries you can try, ordered from simple to complex:
| Try this query | What you'll get | Route |
|---|---|---|
| "How many assets do we have?" | Count from the records available to your role | Governed data query |
| "Show me our top risks" | Ranked risk records where that query is available | Governed data query |
| "Which suppliers are overdue for review?" | Supplier review status where your role permits it | Governed data query |
| "What does our access control policy say about remote work?" | Relevant passages from available approved documentation | Document retrieval |
| "What's our biggest NIS2 compliance gap?" | A supported summary of available assessment information | Grounded analysis |
| "Draft a risk treatment plan for unpatched servers" | A draft for responsible human review | Grounded analysis |
Why Ask amara is different from a general-purpose chat tool
For a supported data request, Ask amara uses the records available to your role. For policy questions, it can retrieve approved documentation rather than relying on an unsourced public-web answer. Responses must remain reviewable; they are not an automatic decision or approval.
Local processing and configured external routes have different boundaries. Review the active deployment and each enabled integration before sending sensitive material; the platform records relevant audit evidence for governed actions.
How the AI decides what to do with your question
Ask amara selects an appropriate governed route for supported questions:
Governed data route
Supported counts, lookups and status requests use a restricted, role-aware data route. The system does not turn a free-text question into unrestricted database access.
Document retrieval
Policy and compliance questions can use available approved documents. Treat returned material as supporting information and confirm the source before relying on it.
Grounded analysis
Where enabled, analysis and drafting use the configured intelligence route with the applicable policy, privacy and audit controls. Drafts remain for human review.
Query pipeline: Compliance Gate → Smart Router → Privacy Shield → governed processing → Audit
Full architecture: configured integrations → amara GRC → Ask amara controls → governed processing → approved external clients
What you can ask
| Question type | Example | Routed to |
|---|---|---|
| Counts | "How many active assets?" | Database (Tier 1) |
| Specific data | "Show critical risks" | Database (Tier 1) |
| Policy questions | "What does our access control policy say?" | RAG (Tier 2) |
| Analysis | "What's our biggest compliance gap?" | Grounded analysis, where enabled |
| Drafting | "Draft a risk treatment plan" | Grounded drafting, for review |
| Complex reasoning | "Compare our NIS2 posture to last quarter" | Configured route, subject to policy |
Processing and egress depend on the active deployment and enabled integrations. Check the applicable configuration and governance controls before using sensitive information.
Query Routing
Ask amara does not treat every message as an open-ended request. It first applies the available product, role, safety and privacy controls, then selects a supported data, document, analysis or configured external route.
Data route → document retrieval → local intelligence → configured external route
Supported routes
| Route | Purpose | Boundary | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data | Restricted, role-aware product queries | Product permissions | Counts, records and status |
| Documents | Available approved documentation | Document access and source review | Policy and procedure questions |
| Local intelligence | Deployment-managed processing | Local deployment controls | Analysis and drafting |
| Configured external route | Optional approved service | Active configuration and policy | Work that is explicitly enabled |
Availability, response time and cost depend on the active deployment, role and configured route. The interface indicates when a supported route cannot be used.
How the router decides: a behind-the-scenes look
The Smart Router classifies a request before selecting a route. It uses defined product controls and does not grant additional data access because of a natural-language instruction.
Tier 1 decision: "Can I answer this from the database?"
For supported requests such as counts, lists and status, the router uses a defined data capability. It does not create arbitrary database queries, and the result remains limited by the caller's role and the available records.
Example: "How many critical assets do we have?" can route to the relevant governed data capability when it is available to your role.
Tier 2 decision: "Is this about policy content?"
For supported policy requests, the router can use available approved documentation. The result should identify or link to its relevant source where possible; always review the underlying policy for a decision.
Example: "What does our access control policy say about remote work?" can return relevant approved documentation that you can review in context.
Tier 3 decision: "This needs reasoning"
Where enabled, the local intelligence route can help with analysis, drafting, comparison and structured work. Its output is a draft or supporting explanation, not a replacement for the responsible owner or required approvals.
Example: "Draft a risk treatment plan for our unpatched server vulnerability" can create a starting point that the Risk Owner must review and approve.
Configured external route
An external route is available only where an administrator has configured and approved it. Its use is subject to the deployment's privacy, egress, consent and audit controls. Do not assume an external route is enabled or suitable for sensitive data.
How to write better queries
The routing system is designed to work with natural language, but a few tips help you get faster, better answers:
- For data questions, be specific: "How many active hardware assets do we have?" is easier to route than "Tell me about our hardware."
- For policy questions, name the document: "What does our Access Control Policy say about remote work?" helps identify the material you need to review.
- For analysis, give context: Explain the decision, scope and time period, then review the draft and its sources.
Before relying on an answer, check whether it is based on governed data, documentation, a configured analysis route or an external connector. Those routes have different evidence and privacy boundaries.
Supported Ask amara Questions
Ask amara provides defined capabilities for authorised data and product information. The supported questions depend on the current implementation and your role.
Start with a specific request
For example, ask for an asset count or the highest recorded risks. Check the source and scope of the answer, and use the relevant module to verify important records.
When a request is unavailable
An unsupported query should remain unavailable or request clarification. Do not treat generated text as evidence that a data export or external action was performed.
Privacy Shield & Data Sovereignty
For organisations with sensitive information, data handling must follow the active deployment, configured integrations and approved governance controls. amara supports local processing and controlled integrations, but neither is a substitute for your organisation's own data-protection review.
What does "data sovereignty" actually mean here?
Data sovereignty depends on the chosen deployment and configuration. Local processing can keep defined workloads within your environment; configured integrations and optional external routes have their own egress and access boundary. Review the relevant integration documentation, deployment settings and audit evidence before enabling or using them.
4 classification tiers: Public → Internal → Confidential → Restricted (each with ISO controls mapped)
What "Privacy Shield" means
- Deployment boundary: Local processing is governed by your chosen environment and access controls.
- Protected data handling: Use only approved routes for personal or sensitive material, following the applicable policy and configuration.
- Configured external routes: Treat every enabled connector or external route as a separate data-flow decision.
- Audit evidence: Use the available audit trail and source information to review governed actions.
Privacy and legal review
amara does not determine your legal obligations. Whether you need a data-processing agreement, impact assessment, transfer assessment or other control depends on your deployment, enabled services, data categories and jurisdiction. Obtain the appropriate legal and privacy review.
Air-gapped deployment
An air-gapped deployment is a deliberate operational design. Its feasibility and maintenance requirements depend on the selected environment, update process and integrations. Do not enable a networked connector in an environment intended to remain isolated.
amara can help collect and review evidence, but an assessment or certification outcome depends on the scope, implementation and independent evaluation of your environment.
Ask amara processing options
Ask amara may offer local and externally configured processing routes, depending on the deployment and administrator settings. This page explains the governance distinction; it does not promise that a particular route is enabled or appropriate for every request.
Choose the route deliberately
Local processing may be appropriate where your environment and operating model require it. It still needs normal access control, patching, logging and operational governance.
Configured external processing is optional and available only when your administrator enables it. Before using it, assess the destination, contractual and privacy controls, the data involved and the purpose of the request.
The practical advice: use the smallest approved route that meets the business need, and keep a human owner responsible for any decision, document or treatment plan.
Comparison
| Consideration | Local processing | Configured external processing |
|---|---|---|
| Availability | Depends on deployment configuration | Requires explicit configuration and approval |
| Data boundary | Defined by the local environment | Defined by the approved destination and route |
| Governance review | Access, patching, logging and local policy | Privacy, contract, egress and local policy |
| Use case | Approved local workloads | Only approved workloads that need the route |
| Air-gap suitability | Depends on the full deployment design | Not suitable while the external route is enabled |
| Cost and response time | Deployment-specific | Agreement and configuration-specific |
Do not rely on this guide as legal advice. Before enabling an external route, determine the appropriate contractual, privacy and security controls for your organisation.
Integration Queries — Prefix Syntax
Ask amara can reach configured external systems as well as authorised local data. Each connector uses a strict prefix — type the prefix, then your question in natural language. The connector must be enabled and your role must permit the request.
Configured connector prefixes
| Prefix | System | Availability | What it queries |
|---|---|---|---|
jira: | Jira | Enabled connector | Tickets, projects and issue details |
confluence: | Confluence | Enabled connector | Available pages and content |
kali: | Security Scanner | Enabled connector | Authorised checks for a selected registered Asset |
azure: | Azure | Enabled connector | Approved identity and activity evidence |
aws: | AWS | Enabled connector | Approved read-only cloud evidence |
Put the supported connector prefix at the beginning of the request. If the connector or request is unavailable, follow the visible feedback rather than assuming that external data was retrieved.
Jira Examples
jira: show open tickets in PROJECT
Lists available issues in the named project, subject to the configured connector and your permissions.
jira: get PROJECT-123
Returns available details of a specific issue, subject to connector configuration and permissions.
jira: list all projects
Shows all Jira projects your service account has access to.
Confluence Examples
confluence: find password policy
Searches page titles and content for "password policy". Returns matching pages with links.
confluence: get page Access Control Policy
Returns the full content of a specific Confluence page by title.
confluence: search ISC space for incident
Searches within a specific space. Useful when you know which space to look in.
Security Scanner via Ask amara
Do not enter raw IP addresses or hostnames into Ask amara. Use the Security Scanner module or Ask amara's registered-Asset picker, select an Asset that is already recorded and authorised for scanning, then choose an allowed scan type. The §202a acknowledgement is enforced before the scan runs.
A scan records technical observations for the selected Asset. It can support the software basket and a later VA re-verification, but a non-detection does not remove recorded software or automatically close a Vulnerability Assurance finding.
Azure Examples
azure: list all users
Returns Entra ID user directory — display name, UPN, account status, last sign-in.
azure: show MFA status
Returns MFA registration status per user — who has it enabled, which methods, coverage percentage.
azure: get groups and members
Lists all Entra ID security groups and their member lists.
Tips for Better Results
- Be specific.
jira: show high-priority open tickets in PROJECTis clearer thanjira: tickets. - Use the documented prefix for the intended connector and check the source shown in the response.
- Check the bell icon. If an integration is offline, the health indicator in Admin Panel → Integrations will show red. Ask amara will return an error message instead of results.
- Keep context explicit. State the relevant Risk or Asset record in a follow-up. Available context handling depends on the active route and session controls.
Reports and Evidence
Open the module relevant to your question and use its available report or export controls.
Reporting and export coverage varies by module; review completeness and permissions before sharing.
Choose a useful scope
Risk, assessment, training and scanner reports serve different purposes. Check the selected records, time period and the meaning of any score.
Review before sharing
Confirm completeness and the recipient's needs. This guide does not promise a separate universal reporting hub, a fixed report catalogue or automatic distribution.
Choosing a Report
Use the report available in the module whose evidence you need.
Examples
An ISO assessment can provide SoA and gap information; Training provides progress evidence; Security Scanning provides scan and asset reports. The available formats differ.
Inspect the output
Review the data scope, missing information and conclusions before using the output for management or audit work.
Preparing Audit Evidence
Agree the required evidence with the responsible reviewer, then collect the relevant module records and available exports.
Check completeness
Review assessment responses, risk decisions, policy versions and training or supplier evidence as applicable to the scope.
Share deliberately
Confirm permissions and sensitive-data handling before sharing. No automatically complete cross-module ZIP package is promised by this guide.
Charts and Visualisations
Module dashboards and reports use charts to summarise the records in their scope.
Read the labels
Check what the chart counts, which time period it covers and whether missing or unassessed records are represented separately.
Use available controls
Follow links or export controls offered by the current chart or report. Do not assume every chart supports the same interactions or file formats.
Exporting Information
Use the export or print control available in the relevant module. Formats and included fields vary.
Check the result
Open the exported file and verify its scope, labels and completeness before sharing.
Recurring distribution
Agree any recurring export or email process separately with the responsible operator. This guide does not describe an installed universal scheduling service.
Admin Panel
Administrators manage users, roles and the settings available in the current deployment. Configured integration pages provide activity and connection information.
Infrastructure, service versions and hardening depend on the selected deployment and its approved operating procedures.
Control access
Assign only the roles required for each person and verify the resulting access. Review changes when responsibilities change.
Operating procedures
Use the approved operator documentation for backups, recovery, infrastructure and service configuration. The presence of an Admin Panel does not imply that every operating task has an application wizard.
Role and Access Reference
The current Admin Panel exposes 18 role controls: Admin, Read Only, Asset Management, Supplier Due Diligence, NIS2 Compliance, General Assessments, Rapid Assessment, ISO 27001, CIA, BSI C5, EU AI Act, Training, Training Admin, Risk Assessment, Document Dialog, Integrations, Security Scanning and Vulnerability Assurance IT Owner.
Assessment, Vulnerability Assurance and scanner access
General Assessments can grant access across CIA, Rapid Assessment, ISO 27001, BSI C5 and EU AI Act; dedicated controls remain available for those areas. NIS2 Compliance, Vulnerability Assurance IT Owner and Security Scanning each use dedicated controls. Administrator access and other module or record checks still apply.
Read-only is a restriction
Read Only restricts changes and does not grant universal viewing access. Combine it with the relevant module permissions and verify the visible result. A demo may have specifically scoped exceptions.
Organisation Settings
Use accurate organisation information in the fields offered by your deployment.
Review dependent work
Organisation information can support assessment inputs and document forms. Review generated output after a change rather than assuming every existing document has updated.
Contact the operator when needed
Infrastructure, email and provider configuration may follow separate operating procedures. Ask the responsible administrator about capabilities not shown in the current interface.
Audit Trail
Use the available activity and audit records to review recorded actions.
Inspect the evidence
Check the actor, time, record and action information present in the selected view. A missing entry needs investigation rather than an assumption that no action occurred.
Coverage and retention
Confirm the actual logging coverage, access and retention rules for the deployment. This guide does not promise that every field change or external event is captured.
Backup and Recovery
Backups and restoration follow the operating procedure approved for your deployment.
Before a change
Confirm the scope and currency of the recovery point, its integrity and the agreed restore procedure with the responsible operator.
Recovery
Use the approved recovery process and verify restored data before returning to service. This guide does not promise an Admin Panel restore wizard, fixed schedule, encryption method or retention period.
Multi-Factor Authentication
MFA adds a time-based verification code to password authentication. Use the account's MFA setup controls when available or required by the deployment.
Set up carefully
Follow the visible setup steps with a compatible authenticator. Keep any recovery codes in an approved secure location and never share the setup secret.
Lost access
Use a permitted recovery code or contact the responsible administrator through the approved account-recovery process. Lockout and enforcement settings depend on the active implementation.
Bell Notifications & Activity Feed
The bell icon in the top navigation bar is your integration activity feed. It can surface events from Jira, Confluence, Azure and Security Scanning — such as ticket status changes, scan completion and treatment-validation prompts — when those connections are enabled.
Where to find it
The bell icon () appears in the top navigation bar, next to your user menu. It is visible when at least one supported integration is enabled. A red badge shows the count of unread events. Click the bell to open a dropdown with recent activity.
What triggers a notification
| Event | Source | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Jira ticket status change | Jira | A linked ticket moved to Done/Resolved/Closed — treatment may need validation |
| @amara mention | Jira / Confluence | Someone mentioned @amara in a Jira comment or Confluence page with a command (link, scan, status, close) |
| Scan completed | Security Scanning | An authorised security scan finished — its evidence is available for review; governed follow-up depends on the result and approval. |
| Treatment validation needed | Internal | A Jira ticket linked to a risk treatment was resolved — human validation required to close the loop |
| Azure sync completed | Azure | Entra ID user/group data was pulled and updated |
The Activity Feed
Click "View all activity" in the bell dropdown to open the full Integration Activity page. It is paginated and filterable by source platform and action type.
Each event shows:
- Source — which platform (Jira, Confluence, Security Scanning or Azure)
- Reference — the ticket ID, page title, or scan target
- Type — mention, status_change, scan_complete, validation
- Action taken — what amara did in response (created risk, progressed treatment, etc.)
- Timestamp — when the event was processed
Clearing Notifications
Notifications are marked as read when you view them. Treatment validation notifications clear automatically when you approve the treatment via Risk Management → Treatment Plans. Bulk clear happens during treatment validation — all related chain references are updated in a single operation.
The bell icon appears only when at least one supported integration is enabled. If you do not see it, ask an administrator to review the organisation's integration configuration and permissions.
Troubleshooting
Start by recording what you expected, the visible result and the module or record involved.
Check access and configuration
Missing controls may reflect role permissions, disabled features or an unavailable integration. Ask the responsible administrator to check the current configuration.
Preserve evidence
For a failed query, export or workflow, retain the relevant error and source context. Use the approved support process and avoid changing production configuration based on a generic help example.
External Integrations
Enabled integrations connect selected AMARA workflows with Jira, Confluence, scanner services and cloud evidence. Each has its own permissions, data flow and update behaviour.
Review external actions
Confirm the target and scope before creating or updating an external record. Check the returned link or status after the action.
Keep evidence and decisions separate
An external status update supports review. It does not automatically approve an assessment, prove remediation or close a Vulnerability Assurance finding.
Jira — Tickets & Loop-Back
Eligible module records can offer a reviewed Jira action when the connector is enabled. Confirm the target and content, then inspect the resulting link. Linked status updates support review; they do not by themselves close the underlying work.
Which Modules Can Create Tickets
Enabled Jira routes use a consistent flow: one click opens a pre-filled ticket form, you confirm, and the ticket lands in your configured Jira project with amara context attached (module, record ID, description, severity).
| Module | What creates the ticket |
|---|---|
| Asset Management | Any asset record — link findings or remediation tasks |
| ISO 27001 | Individual control gaps in the assessment |
| BSI C5 | Individual gaps from the BSI C5 cloud assessment |
| EU AI Act | Gaps from EU AI Act compliance assessment |
| CIA Classification | Individual measures within a CIA evaluation |
| NIS2 Compliance | Remediation actions for NIS2 gaps |
| Risk Management | Individual risk records — link to treatment tasks |
| Supplier Management | Supplier records — flag due diligence or remediation |
| Document Dialog | Published documents — e.g. review-due ticket |
| Information Security Policy | Individual ISP sections or subsections |
| Security Scanner | Individual scan findings (see Security Scanning page) |
| Vulnerability Assurance | An individual finding's permitted remediation action |
| Ask amara | Query only — jira: prefix searches and retrieves Jira tickets via natural language |
| Admin Panel | Review & manage — Integration Activity feed, Pending Reviews queue, status sync |
The Loop-Back Cycle
Ticket created in amara
On an eligible record, use the available Jira action, review the target and content, and confirm. Check the resulting ticket link and recorded context.
Your team works the ticket
Use your normal Jira workflow to assign, comment and progress the ticket. Where a loop-back is configured, amara can present linked status updates and notifications for review.
Configured loop-back detects a status change
The configured Jira connection checks linked references according to its active schedule. A terminal Jira status can be surfaced as evidence or a pending review; it is not, by itself, proof that the GRC work is complete.
Bell notification fires
An in-app bell alert appears for admins. The notification identifies which amara record the ticket was linked to (e.g. "Risk: Unpatched server — Jira ticket resolved").
Admin reviews and decides
An admin opens the review queue and sees the resolved ticket with its amara context. They can Approve (acknowledge the fix is complete) or Dismiss (ticket closed but fix not applied). Important: amara never auto-updates scores. The confirmation message on approval explicitly states: "Assessment status was NOT changed — update manually if needed." The human decides whether to adjust the risk score, compliance status, or asset classification.
amara is designed for auditability. A resolved Jira ticket is evidence that work happened — not automatic proof that the risk is mitigated. The admin review step is intentional: you decide what the ticket resolution means for your GRC posture. The next section explains how Jira actions link Risk and Treatment records.
Jira, Risk and Treatment boundary
For an actionable scanner finding, a user may create a direct Risk or confirm a Jira action. The Jira-from-finding path can create or reuse linked governance records according to the configured workflow. A direct Risk remains its own record unless deliberately linked later.
A ticket status or clean scan is supporting evidence only. The responsible reviewer assesses the complete evidence set and performs the required Risk, Treatment or VA verification decision.
Linked-work review
When a configured connector reports linked work, use the relevant Risk, Jira and Treatment records to review the evidence. A ticket status or scanner result supports review; it does not automatically close Vulnerability Assurance or replace the responsible approver.
Security Scanner evidence is restricted to registered authorised Assets. Jira, Risk and Treatment actions remain governed by the selected workflow and human review.
@amara Mentions in Jira
Where configured, a Jira loop-back can surface relevant linked activity as an in-app notification. The available information and timing depend on the connector configuration and permissions.
Confluence — Publish & Link
Document Dialog can publish to configured Confluence spaces, while supported modules can link existing pages. Check the selected target and resulting page after each action.
Who Can Publish vs. Link
Use Document Dialog for its configured publication action and the link controls provided by other supported modules for existing pages. Available actions depend on the integration and permissions.
| Module | Confluence capability |
|---|---|
| Document Dialog | Publish a reviewed document to the selected space. Check whether the operation creates or updates a page, then inspect the returned link. |
| Information Security Policy | Link — Attach an existing Confluence page URL to an ISP section or subsection |
| Risk Management | Link — Attach an existing Confluence page to a risk record (e.g. a runbook or remediation plan) |
| Asset Management | Link — Attach an existing Confluence page to an asset record (e.g. technical documentation) |
| CIA Classification | Link — Attach an existing Confluence page to a CIA evaluation |
| Admin Panel | Search — Search your Confluence space directly from the admin panel |
| Ask amara | Query — confluence: prefix searches and retrieves Confluence pages via natural language |
How Document Dialog Publishes
Generate your document
Complete a document dialog (fill fields, AI drafts the content) and save the final version.
Click "Publish to Confluence"
Review the target space and existing page before publication. Check the resulting page and its content after the operation.
Page appears in Confluence
The document content lands in your specified Confluence space. amara stores the page URL and displays it as a link on the document record.
@amara Mentions in Confluence
Where configured, Confluence activity can be surfaced as an in-app notification. The available information and timing depend on the connector configuration and permissions.
Security Scanner Cycle
The Security Scanner runs authorised checks against registered Assets and returns durable technical evidence: service and version observations, curated CVE checks, web/TLS checks and passive discovery where applicable. Findings can feed Risk and Jira work; software observations can support Vulnerability Assurance without automatically closing it.
Prerequisites
Asset must have an IP or hostname
- Navigate to the asset record in Asset Management
- Fill in the IP Address or Hostname field
- Assets without either field are excluded from scans automatically
§202a Acknowledgment
- Before triggering a scan, amara displays a §202a StGB warning
- You must confirm you are authorised to scan the target
- This acknowledgment is logged to the audit trail
Choose the right scan
Each scan answers a different question. Choose the narrowest authorised check that gives the evidence you need; a completed result records the selected type and preset so reviewers can see what was actually tested.
| Scan type | Use it for | Available variation | Important boundary |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive | A broad, coordinated evidence run across DNS, ports, TLS, curated CVE checks and web-server checks. | Runs DNS, Nmap, TestSSL, Nuclei and Nikto sequentially as one parent workflow. | It keeps each child result; a child failure is not reported as a clean overall result. |
| Nmap | Open TCP ports plus observed services and versions; the normal starting point for attack-surface evidence. | Quick (top 100), Standard (ports 1–1000), Full TCP, UDP Top, or Aggressive. | Open ports and version strings are observations, not proof that a service is vulnerable or safe. |
| Nmap Vulners | Service-to-CVE checks using the detected service evidence. | No separate user preset. | Results need package-build and vendor-backport review before a vulnerability decision. |
| Nuclei | Curated template-based CVE or exposure checks against an applicable registered Asset. | Known CVEs, broader Vulnerabilities, or informational Technology fingerprint. | A template’s absence or a non-detection is not proof that the Asset has no CVE. |
| Nikto | Known web-server files, outdated components and common configuration issues. | HTTPS 443, HTTP 80, or HTTPS 8443. | It does not test custom application logic such as authorisation, SQL injection or XSS. |
| TestSSL | TLS protocol, cipher and certificate configuration evidence. | HTTPS 443 or HTTPS 8443. | Passing checks are retained as coverage evidence; the main finding view suppresses routine OK/Info noise. |
| DNS, WhatWeb and Gobuster | DNS/WHOIS intelligence, passive web-technology fingerprinting, or curated web-path and DNS-name discovery. | Gobuster offers HTTPS paths, HTTP paths, or DNS names; DNS and WhatWeb have no preset. | These outputs are discovery evidence and require review; they are not vulnerability conclusions. |
Nuclei and Vulnerability Assurance
For a VA-managed Asset, Nuclei separates two evidence lanes: exact active-CVE templates that are installed and software-aware supporting templates derived from recorded software. Direct templates can test named CVEs; supporting checks can help confirm exposed software or services. Neither lane clears a CVE merely because it returns no finding.
For scanner-led VA intake, choose a compatible scan offered by the current workflow. Review product and version candidates before confirming them. A later non-detection does not delete recorded software or close an individual finding.
The Full Scan Cycle
Select assets and confirm §202a
Open the Security Scanner module. You’ll see all active assets that have an IP address or hostname. Select the assets you want to scan, then confirm the §202a acknowledgment.
Choose the authorised check and run it
Select the scan type and safe preset that answer your question: service/version discovery, curated CVE checks, web or TLS checks, or an informational discovery check. amara sends the registered Asset target to the designated scanner service and keeps the selected coverage with the result.
Review observations, coverage and outcome
Every completed, failed or informational result is retained against the Asset with timing and observed evidence. Findings carry their severity where applicable; a clean result means only that this particular check found nothing to flag.
Exit path A — Create a Risk record
Click "Create Risk" on any finding. amara opens the Risk Management new-risk form with the description, asset link, and category pre-filled from the scan finding. Review and adjust the likelihood/impact scores, then save. The risk is now tracked in your Risk Register.
Exit path B — Create a Jira ticket
For an actionable finding, click "Create Jira Ticket" and confirm the pre-filled ticket. amara links the ticket to the finding and creates or reuses the linked Risk/Treatment chain. Jira resolution later supplies evidence; a human still validates before that chain is closed. See Jira — Tickets & Loop-Back.
How Security Scanning supports Vulnerability Assurance
Structured product/version observations from authorised scanner-led VA discovery become source-backed software inventory for the registered Asset and can start matching. After a patch or mitigation, a suitable authorised re-scan can provide fresh technical evidence for a VA reviewer.
Network reachability, credentials and scan coverage limit what a scanner can observe. A non-detection does not remove a recorded software assignment, change public CVSS or close an open Vulnerability Assurance finding. Follow the VA verification workflow to review the whole evidence set.
You may create a Risk directly (Exit path A), or create a Jira ticket from an actionable finding (Exit path B). The Jira-from-finding path creates or reuses its linked Risk/Treatment chain; a directly created Risk remains its own governance record unless you later link work deliberately.
When you confirm a Jira ticket from an actionable finding, amara creates or links the Risk and Treatment records, then monitors the configured Jira loop-back. A resolved ticket can progress the Treatment and raise a review notification, but the final sign-off remains human. Use the Jira — Tickets & Loop-Back page for the detailed lifecycle.
Azure Integration
Configured Azure access can retrieve permitted identity or infrastructure evidence. Requests use the credentials and permissions approved for that deployment.
Review available evidence
Use the supported Ask amara Azure query or Azure Sync controls, as applicable to the information you need. Check the source scope and timestamp.
Asset import
Where offered, import a reviewed infrastructure record as an Asset. Confirm the resulting details and any address needed for authorised scanning. Cloud inventory alone does not establish installed software or a vulnerability.
AWS Sync — Read-only cloud evidence
AWS Sync is an optional Admin Panel integration. It reads approved evidence from your AWS account, stores a timestamped local snapshot for review, and does not change AWS resources.
What an explicit sync retrieves
| AWS evidence | Why it matters in amara |
|---|---|
| IAM users and groups | Identity and access evidence for assessment and audit work. |
| IAM MFA status | Shows MFA coverage and supports access-control evidence. |
| Recent CloudTrail events | Supports audit-log and operational-evidence review. |
| EC2 instances | Lets an administrator import an exact, synchronised compute record into Asset Management. |
Opening Admin Panel → AWS Sync displays the most recent local snapshot. It does not call AWS on page load. An administrator chooses Initial Sync or Resync to request a fresh read-only pull; the result, time and any partial errors are retained for review.
AWS → Asset → VA workflow
Review the AWS snapshot
In Admin Panel → AWS Sync, check connection state, last-sync time, IAM/MFA evidence, CloudTrail results and EC2 inventory.
Import one confirmed EC2 instance
Choose an instance from the latest server-side snapshot. amara creates an Asset record from that cloud inventory; it does not infer installed software from the instance alone.
Opt in and record software separately
The owner explicitly enables the Asset for Vulnerability Assurance when appropriate, then records software through manual entry, SBOM/inventory or authorised Security Scanner evidence.
Review exposure and evidence
VA matches recorded software to public evidence. Use Risk/Treatment, Jira and scanner-supported verification according to the normal governed workflow.
AWS Sync makes configured outbound API reads using approved credentials. It is optional and must be enabled intentionally. The sync does not write to AWS, and cloud inventory is not proof of installed software or a vulnerability.